Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?

Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.

While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).


The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for  https://kruse-rosenberg.technetbloggers.de/very-best-minimum-acceptable-mileage-between-yourself-along-with-a-5g-mobile-tower-system-1682540963  with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.